Report Properties
Thumbnail:

from Flickr
Owner: vta15
Created: Nov 12, 2017
Share: yes
Views: 347
Tags:

Results in this report

Data sets in this report

Need help?
To copy selected text, right click to Copy or choose the Copy option under your browser's Edit menu. Text copied in this manner can be pasted directly into most documents with formatting maintained.
To copy selected graphs, right click on the graph to Copy. When pasting into a document, make sure to paste the graph content rather than a link to the graph. For example, to paste in MS Word choose Edit > Paste Special, and select the Device Independent Bitmap option.
You can now also Mail results and reports. The email may contain a simple link to the StatCrunch site or the complete output with data and graphics attached. In addition to being a great way to deliver output to someone else, this is also a great way to save your own hard copy. To try it out, simply click on the Mail link.
Forbes - America's Best Colleges, 2010 Project Part 2

Forbes - America's Best Colleges, 2010 Owner: cdcummings12

Data set 1. DATA 1 Original Set   [Info]

Result 1: Scatter Plot 1   [Info]

- The 2 quantitative variables that I used were Cost and Total Student Population.

- My scatterplot displays a weak negative correlation. The x was the total student population and the y was the cost. The data is very scattered, however it does seem that the less students there are, the more expensive the university is.

-There are no outliers in this data.

-An appropriate significance level for this 0.05. Thr margin of error is not very small and not very large for the data, so the significance level would be 0.05 and a confidence interval of 95%.

Result 2: Simple Linear Regression 1   [Info]
Simple linear regression results:
Dependent Variable: Cost
Independent Variable: Total Student Population
Cost = 46225.923 - 0.029189982 Total Student Population
Sample size: 98
R (correlation coefficient) = -0.031224727
R-sq = 0.00097498359
Estimate of error standard deviation: 9809.4697

Parameter estimates:
ParameterEstimateStd. Err.AlternativeDFT-StatP-value
Intercept46225.9231222.731 ≠ 09637.805472<0.0001
Slope-0.0291899820.095364722 ≠ 096-0.306087850.7602

Analysis of variance table for regression model:
SourceDFSSMSF-statP-value
Model19015363.39015363.30.0936897710.7602
Error969.2376667e996225695
Total979.2466821e9

Line of Best Fit:

y= cost

x= total student population

y= 46225.923 - 0.029189982x

or Cost = 46225.923 - 0.029189982 Total Student Population

R (correlation coefficient) = -0.031224727.  This shows that my data set is very weak negative, practically no correlation.

Cost and Total Student Population are significant.

Result 3: Line of Best Fit Scatter   [Info]

Interpret your line of best fit

The line of best fit shows that my data is slightly negative.  A lot of the points are at the top left side of the plot, and very few lead to the bottom right of the plot, so since there are so many at the top left, the line of best fit almost looks like a perfect horizontal line, but is slightly negative.  This shows how it is a very weak negative correlation. This means that most of the best universities on the list have a low student population and a high cost.

Interpret r^2

R-sq = 0.00097498359. The R^2 is very small so this shows that the line of best fit is not a strong representation of the data. This is due to the fact that the majority of the schools on the Forbes Best Colleges in the USA for 2010 have a low student population and a high cost.

Correlation and Causation

The Cost and Total Student Population are correlated and causation. The majority of schools that were ranked best in the USA according to Forbes in 2010 were schools that have a low student population. This allows for a more hands-on learning experience and helps makes there colleges as great as they are. However, the smaller the school means they have a more personalized education so this can cause the cost to be higher. Except for 3 colleges, the others were all private colleges which in general tend to have small classroom sizes and a high cost, so therefore the data is correlated and has causation.

Extra Credit: QQ Plots

Result 4: QQ Plot Cost   [Info]

Yes, they followed normal distribution.

Result 5: QQ Plot Student Pop   [Info]