StatCrunch logo (home)

Report Properties

from Flickr
Owner: susuule
Created: May 17, 2017
Share: yes
Views: 448
Results in this report
Data sets in this report
Need help?
To copy selected text, right click to Copy or choose the Copy option under your browser's Edit menu. Text copied in this manner can be pasted directly into most documents with formatting maintained.
To copy selected graphs, right click on the graph to Copy. When pasting into a document, make sure to paste the graph content rather than a link to the graph. For example, to paste in MS Word choose Edit > Paste Special, and select the Device Independent Bitmap option.
You can now also Mail results and reports. The email may contain a simple link to the StatCrunch site or the complete output with data and graphics attached. In addition to being a great way to deliver output to someone else, this is also a great way to save your own hard copy. To try it out, simply click on the Mail link.
T-pumps vs. Kung Fu Tea Boba
Mail   Print   Twitter   Facebook

Susu Le

Susi Le

Ashley Abalos

P. 4

Final Project

II. Data Report

To achieve random samples, we put the digits 1-25 on pieces of paper and put them all into a bowl. The digits correspond to the days starting from April 16th to May 10th. For example, April 16th corresponds to 1, and April 17th corresponds to 2. We pulled out 7 random pieces of paper from the bowl and went to Tpumps and Kung Fu Tea on these particular days. Ashley went to Tpumps while Susu and Susi went to Kung Fu Tea. We bought 5 boba cups from both places on the assigned days around 4-5pm. We collected our data by counting the number of boba pearls in each drink as we drank them. We made sure to order the same size (regular) from both places.

Our populations are Tpumps drinks and Kung Fu Tea drinks. We are confident that our samples match our populations because we selected random days to go collect our data. Because our sample sizes of 35 boba drinks from each place are > 30, our samples are large.

We avoided undercoverage bias for various days by selecting the days to buy boba randomly and not buying all of the drinks in our samples in just one day. We did not avoid undercoverage bias for time of day because we did not collect data throughout the day. Different times of day may cause workers to put different amounts of boba in each drink. For instance, workers may put more boba pearls per drink at the end of the day because the shop is closing soon so they want to get rid of all the leftover boba pearls. Another example of undercoverage bias is how we did not take into consideration the time of year, such as the seasons. Workers may put less boba pearls in each drink during the summer because more people drink boba since the weather is warmer; therefore, workers must conserve boba pearls to satisfy the high demand for boba.

We think that our results generalize to all boba drink sizes from Tpumps and Kung Fu Tea, not just their regular size drinks. We believe Kung Fu Tea workers generally put more boba pearls in each of their drinks than Tpumps workers do.

III. Exploring the Data

Result 3: Summary Stats   [Info]
Summary statistics:
ColumnnMeanStd. dev.Std. err.MedianRangeMinMaxQ1Q3IQR
Kung Fu3591.17142912.5076112.1141722945365118829816

Result 1: Dotplot   [Info]
Right click to copy


As seen in the summary stats and the dotplots above, the center of the Tpumps distribution (36.29 boba pearls) is much lower than the center of the Kung Fu Tea distribution (91.17 boba pearls). The spread for the Tpumps distribution (6.43 boba pearls) is less than the spread for the Kung Fu Tea distribution (12.51 boba pearls). The dotplots above show that the distribution of each sample is symmetrical.

Result 2: Boxplot   [Info]
Right click to copy

The boxplot for Tpumps shows that the Tpumps distribution has one high outlier of 53 boba pearls.

IV. Analyzing the Data

Name: 2-mean t-test


HO: μK = μT     (μK = the true mean boba count in Kung Fu drinks)

 HA: μK μT        (μT = the true mean boba count in T-pumps drinks)


2 independent samples √

Randomized samples √

 n=35>30 for both samples, so by CLT, difference between x̅’s ≈ normal


K = 91.17          sK = 12.51      nK = 35

T = 36.29           sT = 6.43        nT = 35

t = ((91.17-36.29)-0)/√((12.51^2/35)+(6.43^2/35)) = 23.09

p = 0

df = 50.81

α = 0.05

Conclusion: With a p-value of 0<α, I reject HO. We found statistically significant evidence that the true mean boba count in Kung Fu drinks is different than the true mean boba count in T-pumps drinks.

Name: 2-mean t-interval


   (K - T) ± t*SD = (91.17-36.29) ± 1.675(2.853) ⇾ (50.11, 59.66)

Conclusion: I am 95% confident that the true difference between the means of boba count is between 50.11 and 59.66 boba pearls.


Grand Conclusion:


Although we did avoid the undercoverage bias for various days by not buying all of the drinks in the same day, we did not avoid the undercoverage bias for time of day. This bias could have caused an underestimate of the parameter for T-pumps’s drinks because most of T-pumps customers are high school students while Kung Fu customers vary, so the 4-5pm time range may have been a busy time for T-pumps; therefore, they put less boba in their drinks to conserve boba. However, since the p-value is so small and the confidence interval is so far off from 0, we did find statistically significant evidence that there is a difference between the boba count of Kung Fu drinks and of T-pumps drinks. The difference is so large that any sampling variability or biases that we did not avoid could not account for all of it. Therefore, we can conclude from our data that Kung Fu puts more boba pearls into their drinks than T-pumps.


Data set 1. Number of Boba Pearls Per Drink   [Info]
To analyze this data, please sign in.

HTML link:
<A href="">T-pumps vs. Kung Fu Tea Boba</A>

Want to comment? Subscribe
Already a member? Sign in.

Always Learning