StatCrunch logo (home)

Report Properties
Thumbnail:
Owner: amollo26
Created: Oct 7, 2013
Share: yes
Views: 134951
Tags:
 
Results in this report
 
Data sets in this report
None
 
Need help?
To copy selected text, right click to Copy or choose the Copy option under your browser's Edit menu. Text copied in this manner can be pasted directly into most documents with formatting maintained.
To copy selected graphs, right click on the graph to Copy. When pasting into a document, make sure to paste the graph content rather than a link to the graph. For example, to paste in MS Word choose Edit > Paste Special, and select the Device Independent Bitmap option.
You can now also Mail results and reports. The email may contain a simple link to the StatCrunch site or the complete output with data and graphics attached. In addition to being a great way to deliver output to someone else, this is also a great way to save your own hard copy. To try it out, simply click on the Mail link.
Correlation of Shoe Size and Height (Andy Mollo's StatCrunch Report #2)
Mail   Print   Twitter   Facebook

Are people with big feet taller than people with small feet? My StatCrunch report attempts to see if there is a correlation between shoe size and height. The data I used came from the Sullivan Statistics Survey.

 

Scatterplot 1 shows a scatter diagram with shoe size as the explanatory variable and height (in inches) as the response variable. The shape of the scatterplot indicates that there is a positive linear correlation between the two variables. In general, as shoe size increases, height increases.

 

Result 1: Scatterplot 1: Correlation of Shoe Size and Height   [Info]
Right click to copy

 

The Dataset confirms this linear correlation. The correlation coefficient (R) for these variables is 0.6222. While Table II from the Sullivan text doesn't give a critical correlation coefficient value for a scenario like this where n = 199, the critical correlation coefficient value for n = 30 is 0.361. Since 0.6222 is greater than 0.361 and since the critical correlation coefficient value decreases as n increases, we can assume that 0.6222 shows that there is indeed a linear correlation between shoe size and height.

 

The Dataset also shows that the R squared value is 0.3871. This means that 38.71% of the variability in height is explained by shoe size. The Dataset also shows the slope of the best fit line: y-hat = 50.874798 + 1.6565183x. So, for example, if someone's shoe size is 10, we would expect them to 67.44 inches tall.

 

Result 2: Dataset: Correlation of Shoe Size and Height   [Info]
Simple linear regression results:
Dependent Variable: Height
Independent Variable: Foot
Height = 50.874798 + 1.6565183 Foot
Sample size: 199
R (correlation coefficient) = 0.6222
R-sq = 0.38713068
Estimate of error standard deviation: 3.7840705

Parameter estimates:
Parameter Estimate Std. Err. Alternative DF T-Stat P-Value
Intercept 50.874798 1.5311509 ≠ 0 197 33.22651 <0.0001
Slope 1.6565183 0.14849721 ≠ 0 197 11.155215 <0.0001


Analysis of variance table for regression model:
Source DF SS MS F-stat P-value
Model 1 1781.8633 1781.8633 124.438835 <0.0001
Error 197 2820.8804 14.31919
Total 198 4602.7437


Predicted values:
X value Pred. Y s.e.(Pred. y) 95% C.I. for mean 95% P.I. for new
10 67.43998 0.2691875 (66.90912, 67.97084) (59.958637, 74.921326)


Residuals stored in new column, Residuals.

 

Scatterplot 2 is a scatter diagram of the residuals. There is no pattern to the residuals. They are scattered at random. This suggests that the linear model can appropriately describe the correlation between shoe size and height.

 

Result 3: Scatterplot 2: Residuals v. Shoe Size   [Info]
Right click to copy

 

The Boxplot shows that there are four residual outliers. Reviewing the raw data from the Sullivan Statistics Survey suggests that these outliers are not the result of data entry errors. All of the outliers, such as a 4'4" person having size 12 feet, are extreme but within the realm of possibility. Thus, it would not be appropriate to immediately discard them. Since there are outliers both above and below the boxplot, the outliers balance each other out to an extent and probably do not affect our analysis too much.

 

Result 4: Boxplot: Residuals   [Info]
Right click to copy

 

This analysis shows that there is a linear correlation between foot size and height. We can expect people with large feet to be taller than people with small feet. However, there are a few sources of error in our analysis which could be addressed in future studies. For one, shoe size is not a perfect measure of foot size. Some people may not be wearing shoes which fit them properly. It might be better to directly measure foot size. Also, men and women have different shoe size scales. A size 10 for women is smaller than a size 10 for men. If shoe size, rather than foot size, must be used, it might be helpful to break women and men apart in future studies. Nevertheless, since such a strong linear correlation was found in this study, I would expect to still find one in any future study.

HTML link:
<A href="https://www.statcrunch.com/5.0/viewreport.php?reportid=35115">Correlation of Shoe Size and Height (Andy Mollo's StatCrunch Report #2)</A>

Comments
Want to comment? Subscribe
Already a member? Sign in.
By msullivan13803
Oct 8, 2013

Very well done (and thorough).
By mkoche24
Oct 7, 2013

Solid report, I can clearly see your conclusion play out in reality. I am 5'11 and wear a size 13 shoe so I would seem to support the results of your analysis. Your information is straightforward and easy to understand. I like that you also included some potential sources of error, and things that could have been done different to improve the accuracy of the data.

-Mike Kochendorfer
By cjgrieff
Oct 7, 2013

By cjgrieff
Oct 7, 2013

This is a data set that was perfect for this project. You did a very good job of explaining how the data is represented with each part of the data sets given. It is almost just thought that taller people have larger feet but looking at this data that is not always true by looking at the outliers. This report was very interesting and you did a very good job with explaining it all.

Carli Grieff
By gowmaster93
Oct 7, 2013

I found this one to be pretty interesting to read. I had always figured that bigger feet meant a person was most likely taller than someone who has smaller feet. It is good that you pointed how this is not always the case, such as accounting for people not wearing the proper shoe size or just people that have a shoe size not normal for his or height. Overall, this was a good report. Nice job.

-Brandon White
By marissasperti
Oct 7, 2013

This information is all very interesting. While it seems to be obvious that the taller you are the bigger the shoe size, it still seems to very. And of course differs whether or not you are a man or a woman.

Always Learning