StatCrunch logo (home)

Results shared by StatCrunch members
Showing 1 to 15 of 1707 results matching Contingency Table
Name/Notes Owner Created Size Views

Contingency table results:


Rows: Sex
Columns: Confidence

Cell format
Count
(Row percent)

Neither confident nor not confidentSomewhat confidentSomewhat not confidentVery confidentVery not confidentTotal
Female86
(10.46%)
494
(60.1%)
27
(3.28%)
207
(25.18%)
8
(0.97%)
822
(100%)
Male48
(8.73%)
269
(48.91%)
15
(2.73%)
212
(38.55%)
6
(1.09%)
550
(100%)
Other3
(27.27%)
6
(54.55%)
0
(0%)
2
(18.18%)
0
(0%)
11
(100%)
Prefer not to say1
(25%)
0
(0%)
0
(0%)
3
(75%)
0
(0%)
4
(100%)
Total138
(9.95%)
769
(55.44%)
42
(3.03%)
424
(30.57%)
14
(1.01%)
1387
(100%)

Chi-Square test:


StatisticDFValueP-value
Chi-square1238.3172250.0001
Warning: over 20% of cells have an expected count less than 5.
Chi-Square suspect.
Contingency table (with data)
Thomas Phipps
phipp2Feb 21, 20194KB0

Contingency table results:


Rows: Gender
Columns: Blood Type

Cell format
Count
(Row percent)
(Column percent)
(Percent of total)
(Expected count)
(Contributions to Chi-Square)
(Chi-Square residuals)
(Standardized Chi-Square residuals)

aabboTotal
f1
(11.11%)
(20%)
(5%)
(2.25)
(0.69)
(-1.25)
(-0.83)
2
(22.22%)
(100%)
(10%)
(0.9)
(1.34)
(1.1)
(1.16)
1
(11.11%)
(50%)
(5%)
(0.9)
(0.01)
(0.1)
(0.11)
5
(55.56%)
(45.45%)
(25%)
(4.95)
(0)
(0.05)
(0.02)
9
(100%)
(45%)
(45%)
m4
(36.36%)
(80%)
(20%)
(2.75)
(0.57)
(1.25)
(0.75)
0
(0%)
(0%)
(0%)
(1.1)
(1.1)
(-1.1)
(-1.05)
1
(9.09%)
(50%)
(5%)
(1.1)
(0.01)
(-0.1)
(-0.1)
6
(54.55%)
(54.55%)
(30%)
(6.05)
(0)
(-0.05)
(-0.02)
11
(100%)
(55%)
(55%)
Total5
(25%)
(100%)
(25%)
2
(10%)
(100%)
(10%)
2
(10%)
(100%)
(10%)
11
(55%)
(100%)
(55%)
20
(100%)
(100%)
(100%)

Chi-Square test:


StatisticDFValueP-value
Chi-square33.7281910.2923
Warning: over 20% of cells have an expected count less than 5.
Chi-Square suspect.

Fisher's exact test:


Test only available for 2 x 2 tables.

McNemar's test for marginal homogeneity


Test only available for 2 x 2 tables.

Cramer's V test for association:


MeasureDFValueP-value
Cramer's V30.431750.2923

95% confidence interval results:


MeasureValueStd. Err.L. LimitU. Limit
Lambda C|R0000
Lambda R|C0.222220.1959800.60634
Lambda symmetric0.111110.0995300.30619
Uncertainty coef C|R0.101040.0611500.22088
Uncertainty coef R|C0.166780.1093200.38105
Uncertainty symmetric0.125840.078200.27911
Gamma-0.156250.35729-0.856530.54403
Somer's d C|R-0.101010.23294-0.557560.35554
Somer's d R|C-0.08130.18699-0.44780.2852
Tau-b-0.090620.20861-0.499490.31824
Tau-c-0.10.23065-0.552070.35207
There must be an equal number of rows and columns to calculate the kappa measure.
Relative risk only available for 2 x 2 tables.
Odds ratio only available for 2 x 2 tables.
Contingency table (with data) health
djmccarthy1Feb 20, 20197KB0

Contingency table results:


Rows: var4
Columns: var1

Cell format
Count
(Row percent)

ABCDFTotal
DL25
(21.37%)
38
(32.48%)
30
(25.64%)
12
(10.26%)
12
(10.26%)
117
(100%)
OC27
(25.96%)
39
(37.5%)
17
(16.35%)
11
(10.58%)
10
(9.62%)
104
(100%)
Total52
(23.53%)
77
(34.84%)
47
(21.27%)
23
(10.41%)
22
(9.95%)
221
(100%)

Chi-Square test:


StatisticDFValueP-value
Chi-square43.15716980.5319
Contingency table (with data)
debe744c1d1b436881d2d45226c894b5_blackboardht_toledoFeb 10, 20193KB3

Contingency table results:


Rows: var4
Columns: var1

Cell format
Count
(Row percent)

ABCDFTotal
DL25
(21.37%)
38
(32.48%)
30
(25.64%)
12
(10.26%)
12
(10.26%)
117
(100%)
OC27
(25.96%)
39
(37.5%)
17
(16.35%)
11
(10.58%)
10
(9.62%)
104
(100%)
Total52
(23.53%)
77
(34.84%)
47
(21.27%)
23
(10.41%)
22
(9.95%)
221
(100%)

Chi-Square test:


StatisticDFValueP-value
Chi-square43.15716980.5319
Contingency table (with data)
a3a9b42b06e34d0b80262806b46b9ab4_blackboardht_toledoFeb 8, 20193KB3

Contingency table results:


Rows: survived
Columns: pclass

Cell format
Count
(Row percent)
(Column percent)

123Total
025
(8.09%)
(14.2%)
23
(7.44%)
(17.69%)
261
(84.47%)
(66.08%)
309
(100%)
(44.08%)
1151
(38.52%)
(85.8%)
107
(27.3%)
(82.31%)
134
(34.18%)
(33.92%)
392
(100%)
(55.92%)
Total176
(25.11%)
(100%)
130
(18.54%)
(100%)
395
(56.35%)
(100%)
701
(100%)
(100%)
Contingency table (with data)
66c45cc0ddcf48fa850e1e788b39b046_moodleblti_ualbertFeb 6, 20192KB5

Contingency table results:


Rows: pclass
Columns: survived

Cell format
Count
(Row percent)
(Column percent)

01Total
1123
(38.08%)
(15.2%)
200
(61.92%)
(40%)
323
(100%)
(24.68%)
2158
(57.04%)
(19.53%)
119
(42.96%)
(23.8%)
277
(100%)
(21.16%)
3528
(74.47%)
(65.27%)
181
(25.53%)
(36.2%)
709
(100%)
(54.16%)
Total809
(61.8%)
(100%)
500
(38.2%)
(100%)
1309
(100%)
(100%)
Survived VS Class Contingency Table
06699357e8064ee2bdde64ba6bf04560_moodleblti_ualbertFeb 6, 20192KB9

Contingency table results:


Rows: pclass
Columns: survived

Cell format
Count
(Row percent)
(Column percent)

01Total
1123
(38.08%)
(15.2%)
200
(61.92%)
(40%)
323
(100%)
(24.68%)
2158
(57.04%)
(19.53%)
119
(42.96%)
(23.8%)
277
(100%)
(21.16%)
3528
(74.47%)
(65.27%)
181
(25.53%)
(36.2%)
709
(100%)
(54.16%)
Total809
(61.8%)
(100%)
500
(38.2%)
(100%)
1309
(100%)
(100%)

Chi-Square test:


StatisticDFValueP-value
Chi-square2127.85916<0.0001
Contingency table (with data)111
424c83f8841342cda0463c207fd3df0b_moodleblti_ualbertFeb 5, 20192KB4

Contingency table results:


Where: sex = "female" or age < 12
Rows: survived
Columns: p class

Cell format
Count
(Row percent)
(Column percent)

123Total
05
(3.33%)
(3.38%)
12
(8%)
(10.26%)
133
(88.67%)
(53.2%)
150
(100%)
(29.13%)
1143
(39.18%)
(96.62%)
105
(28.77%)
(89.74%)
117
(32.05%)
(46.8%)
365
(100%)
(70.87%)
Total148
(28.74%)
(100%)
117
(22.72%)
(100%)
250
(48.54%)
(100%)
515
(100%)
(100%)

Chi-Square test:


StatisticDFValueP-value
Chi-square2137.8994<0.0001
Contingency table (with data)
158bc0248597445baa47184d6098166a_moodleblti_ualbertFeb 3, 20192KB11

Contingency table results:


Rows: pclass
Columns: survived

Cell format
Count
(Row percent)
(Column percent)
(Percent of total)

01Total
1123
(38.08%)
(15.2%)
(9.4%)
200
(61.92%)
(40%)
(15.28%)
323
(100%)
(24.68%)
(24.68%)
2158
(57.04%)
(19.53%)
(12.07%)
119
(42.96%)
(23.8%)
(9.09%)
277
(100%)
(21.16%)
(21.16%)
3528
(74.47%)
(65.27%)
(40.34%)
181
(25.53%)
(36.2%)
(13.83%)
709
(100%)
(54.16%)
(54.16%)
Total809
(61.8%)
(100%)
(61.8%)
500
(38.2%)
(100%)
(38.2%)
1309
(100%)
(100%)
(100%)
Contingency table for pclass and survival
e33717238fd945b4aabcc1aca9e6d229_moodleblti_ualbertFeb 3, 20192KB7

Contingency table results:


Rows: survived
Columns: pclass

Cell format
Count
(Row percent)
(Column percent)

123Total
0123
(15.2%)
(38.08%)
158
(19.53%)
(57.04%)
528
(65.27%)
(74.47%)
809
(100%)
(61.8%)
1200
(40%)
(61.92%)
119
(23.8%)
(42.96%)
181
(36.2%)
(25.53%)
500
(100%)
(38.2%)
Total323
(24.68%)
(100%)
277
(21.16%)
(100%)
709
(54.16%)
(100%)
1309
(100%)
(100%)

Chi-Square test:


StatisticDFValueP-value
Chi-square2127.85916<0.0001
Contingency table (with data)
89df74c38d394b0dae4513f6956f6417_moodleblti_ualbertJan 30, 20192KB6

Contingency table results for age=0 to 20:


Rows: survived
Columns: p class

Cell format
Count
(Row percent)
(Column percent)

123Total
05
(4.2%)
(19.23%)
16
(13.45%)
(31.37%)
98
(82.35%)
(66.22%)
119
(100%)
(52.89%)
121
(19.81%)
(80.77%)
35
(33.02%)
(68.63%)
50
(47.17%)
(33.78%)
106
(100%)
(47.11%)
Total26
(11.56%)
(100%)
51
(22.67%)
(100%)
148
(65.78%)
(100%)
225
(100%)
(100%)

Chi-Square test:


StatisticDFValueP-value
Chi-square231.847357<0.0001

Contingency table results for age=20 to 40:


Rows: survived
Columns: p class

Cell format
Count
(Row percent)
(Column percent)

123Total
036
(10.26%)
(29.03%)
92
(26.21%)
(59.74%)
223
(63.53%)
(74.83%)
351
(100%)
(60.94%)
188
(39.11%)
(70.97%)
62
(27.56%)
(40.26%)
75
(33.33%)
(25.17%)
225
(100%)
(39.06%)
Total124
(21.53%)
(100%)
154
(26.74%)
(100%)
298
(51.74%)
(100%)
576
(100%)
(100%)

Chi-Square test:


StatisticDFValueP-value
Chi-square277.289906<0.0001

Contingency table results for age=40 to 60:


Rows: survived
Columns: p class

Cell format
Count
(Row percent)
(Column percent)

123Total
046
(38.02%)
(42.59%)
31
(25.62%)
(64.58%)
44
(36.36%)
(89.8%)
121
(100%)
(59.02%)
162
(73.81%)
(57.41%)
17
(20.24%)
(35.42%)
5
(5.95%)
(10.2%)
84
(100%)
(40.98%)
Total108
(52.68%)
(100%)
48
(23.41%)
(100%)
49
(23.9%)
(100%)
205
(100%)
(100%)

Chi-Square test:


StatisticDFValueP-value
Chi-square231.854147<0.0001

Contingency table results for age=60 to 80:


Rows: survived
Columns: p class

Cell format
Count
(Row percent)
(Column percent)

123Total
016
(57.14%)
(64%)
7
(25%)
(87.5%)
5
(17.86%)
(83.33%)
28
(100%)
(71.79%)
19
(81.82%)
(36%)
1
(9.09%)
(12.5%)
1
(9.09%)
(16.67%)
11
(100%)
(28.21%)
Total25
(64.1%)
(100%)
8
(20.51%)
(100%)
6
(15.38%)
(100%)
39
(100%)
(100%)

Chi-Square test:


StatisticDFValueP-value
Chi-square22.11904220.3466
Warning: over 20% of cells have an expected count less than 5.
Chi-Square suspect.

Contingency table results for age=80 to 100:


Rows: survived
Columns: p class

Cell format
Count
(Row percent)
(Column percent)

123Total
00
(NaN%)
(0%)
0
(NaN%)
(NaN%)
0
(NaN%)
(NaN%)
0
(100%)
(0%)
11
(100%)
(100%)
0
(0%)
(NaN%)
0
(0%)
(NaN%)
1
(100%)
(100%)
Total1
(100%)
(100%)
0
(0%)
(100%)
0
(0%)
(100%)
1
(100%)
(100%)

Chi-Square test:


StatisticDFValueP-value
Chi-square2NaNNaN
Warning: over 20% of cells have an expected count less than 5.
Chi-Square suspect.

Contingency table 3c
158bc0248597445baa47184d6098166a_moodleblti_ualbertJan 28, 201912KB15

Contingency table results:


Rows: survived
Columns: p class

Cell format
Count
(Row percent)
(Column percent)

123Total
0123
(15.2%)
(38.08%)
158
(19.53%)
(57.04%)
528
(65.27%)
(74.47%)
809
(100%)
(61.8%)
1200
(40%)
(61.92%)
119
(23.8%)
(42.96%)
181
(36.2%)
(25.53%)
500
(100%)
(38.2%)
Total323
(24.68%)
(100%)
277
(21.16%)
(100%)
709
(54.16%)
(100%)
1309
(100%)
(100%)

Chi-Square test:


StatisticDFValueP-value
Chi-square2127.85916<0.0001
Contingency table (with data) 3a
933f408ea67f4a038bf23d74a035eb50_moodleblti_ualbertJan 26, 20192KB13

Contingency table results:


Rows: Make
Columns: Type

Cell format
Count
(Row percent)

4x4BuickOtherSUVSedanSportSportsSudanTruckTotal
Acura0
(0%)
0
(0%)
0
(0%)
1
(100%)
0
(0%)
0
(0%)
0
(0%)
0
(0%)
0
(0%)
1
(100%)
BMW0
(0%)
0
(0%)
0
(0%)
0
(0%)
1
(100%)
0
(0%)
0
(0%)
0
(0%)
0
(0%)
1
(100%)
Buick0
(0%)
1
(100%)
0
(0%)
0
(0%)
0
(0%)
0
(0%)
0
(0%)
0
(0%)
0
(0%)
1
(100%)
Cadillac0
(0%)
0
(0%)
0
(0%)
0
(0%)
1
(100%)
0
(0%)
0
(0%)
0
(0%)
0
(0%)
1
(100%)
Chevy0
(0%)
0
(0%)
0
(0%)
2
(66.67%)
0
(0%)
1
(33.33%)
0
(0%)
0
(0%)
0
(0%)
3
(100%)
Chrysler0
(0%)
0
(0%)
0
(0%)
0
(0%)
1
(100%)
0
(0%)
0
(0%)
0
(0%)
0
(0%)
1
(100%)
Civic0
(0%)
0
(0%)
0
(0%)
0
(0%)
1
(100%)
0
(0%)
0
(0%)
0
(0%)
0
(0%)
1
(100%)
Dodge0
(0%)
0
(0%)
0
(0%)
1
(25%)
0
(0%)
2
(50%)
0
(0%)
0
(0%)
1
(25%)
4
(100%)
Ford0
(0%)
0
(0%)
0
(0%)
0
(0%)
2
(100%)
0
(0%)
0
(0%)
0
(0%)
0
(0%)
2
(100%)
GMC0
(0%)
0
(0%)
0
(0%)
1
(100%)
0
(0%)
0
(0%)
0
(0%)
0
(0%)
0
(0%)
1
(100%)
Honda1
(9.09%)
0
(0%)
2
(18.18%)
3
(27.27%)
3
(27.27%)
1
(9.09%)
0
(0%)
1
(9.09%)
0
(0%)
11
(100%)
Hyundai0
(0%)
0
(0%)
0
(0%)
0
(0%)
1
(100%)
0
(0%)
0
(0%)
0
(0%)
0
(0%)
1
(100%)
Jaguar0
(0%)
0
(0%)
0
(0%)
0
(0%)
0
(0%)
0
(0%)
1
(100%)
0
(0%)
0
(0%)
1
(100%)
Jeep8
(100%)
0
(0%)
0
(0%)
0
(0%)
0
(0%)
0
(0%)
0
(0%)
0
(0%)
0
(0%)
8
(100%)
KIA0
(0%)
0
(0%)
0
(0%)
0
(0%)
1
(100%)
0
(0%)
0
(0%)
0
(0%)
0
(0%)
1
(100%)
Kia0
(0%)
0
(0%)
0
(0%)
1
(33.33%)
2
(66.67%)
0
(0%)
0
(0%)
0
(0%)
0
(0%)
3
(100%)
Lexus0
(0%)
0
(0%)
0
(0%)
0
(0%)
1
(100%)
0
(0%)
0
(0%)
0
(0%)
0
(0%)
1
(100%)
Mercedes0
(0%)
0
(0%)
0
(0%)
0
(0%)
2
(100%)
0
(0%)
0
(0%)
0
(0%)
0
(0%)
2
(100%)
Nissan0
(0%)
0
(0%)
0
(0%)
0
(0%)
2
(50%)
0
(0%)
2
(50%)
0
(0%)
0
(0%)
4
(100%)
Other0
(0%)
0
(0%)
1
(50%)
0
(0%)
1
(50%)
0
(0%)
0
(0%)
0
(0%)
0
(0%)
2
(100%)
Prius0
(0%)
0
(0%)
0
(0%)
0
(0%)
1
(100%)
0
(0%)
0
(0%)
0
(0%)
0
(0%)
1
(100%)
Silverado0
(0%)
0
(0%)
0
(0%)
0
(0%)
0
(0%)
0
(0%)
0
(0%)
0
(0%)
1
(100%)
1
(100%)
Subaru0
(0%)
0
(0%)
0
(0%)
1
(100%)
0
(0%)
0
(0%)
0
(0%)
0
(0%)
0
(0%)
1
(100%)
Toyota0
(0%)
0
(0%)
1
(16.67%)
1
(16.67%)
1
(16.67%)
0
(0%)
1
(16.67%)
0
(0%)
2
(33.33%)
6
(100%)
VW0
(0%)
0
(0%)
0
(0%)
1
(100%)
0
(0%)
0
(0%)
0
(0%)
0
(0%)
0
(0%)
1
(100%)
Volkswagen1
(50%)
0
(0%)
0
(0%)
0
(0%)
1
(50%)
0
(0%)
0
(0%)
0
(0%)
0
(0%)
2
(100%)
Total10
(16.13%)
1
(1.61%)
4
(6.45%)
12
(19.35%)
22
(35.48%)
4
(6.45%)
4
(6.45%)
1
(1.61%)
4
(6.45%)
62
(100%)

Chi-Square test:


StatisticDFValueP-value
Chi-square200241.882550.0229
Warning: over 20% of cells have an expected count less than 5.
Chi-Square suspect.
Contingency table (with data)
Kaitlin
kaitlincreedonJan 17, 201916KB12

Contingency table results:


Rows: var1
Columns: None

Cell format
Count
(Row percent)

var2var3Total
healthy35
(52.24%)
32
(47.76%)
67
(100%)
relapse14
(53.85%)
12
(46.15%)
26
(100%)
Total49
(52.69%)
44
(47.31%)
93
(100%)

Chi-Square test:


StatisticDFValueP-value
Chi-square10.0194134220.8892
Contingency table (with summary)
jbethea223Jan 16, 20192KB6

Contingency table results:


Rows: On_campus
Columns: Current_credit_hrs
0 to 55 to 1010 to 1515 to 2020 to 25Total
No441423923308916
Yes01933638465
Total44143485693161381

Chi-Square test:


StatisticDFValueP-value
Chi-square4248.10696<0.0001
Pishgahzadeh_Contingency table (with data)
mitrapishgahzadehJan 8, 20192KB7

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10   >

Always Learning