StatCrunch logo (home)

Results shared by StatCrunch members
Showing 121 to 135 of 101873 results
Name/Notes Owner Created Size Views
Two sample T hypothesis testisangsmith17Aug 4, 2019174B11

Two sample T hypothesis test:


μ1 : Mean of Age where Category = No
μ2 : Mean of Age where Category = Yes
μ1 - μ2 : Difference between two means
H0 : μ1 - μ2 = 0
HA : μ1 - μ2 ≠ 0
(with pooled variances)

Hypothesis test results:
DifferenceSample Diff.Std. Err.DFT-StatP-value
μ1 - μ2-0.170731713.3543861121-0.0508980480.9595
Two sample T hypothesis test
isangsmith17Aug 4, 20191KB10

Two sample T hypothesis test:


μ1 : Mean of Age where Category = Yes
μ2 : Mean of Age where Category = No
μ1 - μ2 : Difference between two means
H0 : μ1 - μ2 = 0
HA : μ1 - μ2 ≠ 0
(without pooled variances)

Hypothesis test results:
DifferenceSample Diff.Std. Err.DFT-StatP-value
μ1 - μ20.170731713.57876367.8436360.0477069060.9621
Two sample T hypothesis test
isangsmith17Aug 4, 20191KB10

Two sample T hypothesis test:


μ1 : Mean of Age where Category = Yes
μ2 : Mean of Age where Category = No
μ1 - μ2 : Difference between two means
H0 : μ1 - μ2 = 0
HA : μ1 - μ2 ≠ 0
(without pooled variances)

Hypothesis test results:
DifferenceSample Diff.Std. Err.DFT-StatP-value
μ1 - μ20.170731713.57876367.8436360.0477069060.9621
Two sample T hypothesis test
isangsmith17Aug 4, 20191KB10

One sample T hypothesis test:


Group by: Play
μ : Mean of Age
H0 : μ = 0
HA : μ ≠ 0

Hypothesis test results:
PlaySample MeanStd. Err.DFT-StatP-value
No40.8292683.09304934013.200329<0.0001
Yes411.80016398122.775704<0.0001

Shapiro-Wilk normality test results:


PlaynStatP-Value
No410.920191670.0069
Yes820.98078010.2571
Cellphone Data (Group 2) MAT215
Cellphone Data (Group 2) MAT215
antoinemason18Aug 3, 20192KB11

Summary statistics:


ColumnnMeanVarianceStd. dev.Std. err.MedianRangeMinMaxQ1Q3
Nebulizer call/start times1514.4154.1142912.4142773.20535271043245518
Cont. Nebs22021.4142136120219211921
ABG'S217.5612.524.74873717.517.535035035
High flow126NaNNaNNaN26026262626
Codes10NaNNaNNaN000000
Transports165NaNNaNNaN65065656565
MDI17NaNNaNNaN707777
Caphnography113NaNNaNNaN13013131313
VBG's323.666667192.3333313.8684298.0069414202712391239
Bipap10NaNNaNNaN000000
Summary Stats
chambersk5Aug 3, 20196KB14
Simple Linear Regressionwatsons14Aug 2, 2019174B10
Scatter PlotjenbernardAug 2, 2019174B11
Scatter PlotjenbernardAug 2, 2019174B12
Scatter PlotDomestic Water and Dental Cariesjoel.pikeAug 2, 2019174B13
Coin flippingecortes196Aug 1, 2019174B11

Contingency table results:


Rows: Type of Transportation
Columns: Pay for Fuel

Cell format
Count
(Expected count)

NYTotal
Bicycle1
(0.06)
0
(0.94)
1
Motor Vehicle5
(11.43)
174
(167.57)
179
Public Transportation1
(0.19)
2
(2.81)
3
Walk5
(0.32)
0
(4.68)
5
Total12176188

Chi-Square test:


StatisticDFValueP-value
Chi-square395.506461<0.0001
Warning: over 20% of cells have an expected count less than 5.
Chi-Square suspect.
Contingency table (with data) Type of Transportation Pay for Fuel
dolorestodaroAug 1, 20192KB11

One sample Z confidence interval:


μ : Mean of variable
Standard deviation not specified.

95% confidence interval results:
VariablenSample MeanStd. Err.L. LimitU. Limit
var12521.120.6463229319.8532322.38677
var32515.720.1872609615.35297516.087025
var2251.2560.0465761031.16471251.3472875
var42512.920.7459222511.45801914.381981
var5250.8720.0484836740.776973740.96702626
var62514.960.8336266213.32612216.593878
var72513.20.7348469211.75972614.640274
var8250.9160.0495580470.818868011.013132
var92514.80.8465616713.1407716.45923
One sample Z confidence interval
kwilde44Aug 1, 20193KB11

Frequency table results for Cell:


Count = 310
CellFrequencyRelative Frequency
no670.21612903
yes2430.78387097

Frequency Table
niaa003Jul 31, 2019828B13

Contingency table results:


Rows: Yes/No
Columns: Category

Cell format
Count
(Row percent)
(Column percent)
(Percent of total)
(Expected count)
(Contributions to Chi-Square)

Action/AdventureDoes not playOtherPuzzleRole-playingSportsStrategyTotal
No1
(2.44%)
(11.11%)
(0.81%)
(3)
(1.33)
40
(97.56%)
(97.56%)
(32.52%)
(13.67)
(50.74)
0
(0%)
(0%)
(0%)
(4)
(4)
0
(0%)
(0%)
(0%)
(13.33)
(13.33)
0
(0%)
(0%)
(0%)
(1)
(1)
0
(0%)
(0%)
(0%)
(3)
(3)
0
(0%)
(0%)
(0%)
(3)
(3)
41
(100%)
(33.33%)
(33.33%)
Yes8
(9.76%)
(88.89%)
(6.5%)
(6)
(0.67)
1
(1.22%)
(2.44%)
(0.81%)
(27.33)
(25.37)
12
(14.63%)
(100%)
(9.76%)
(8)
(2)
40
(48.78%)
(100%)
(32.52%)
(26.67)
(6.67)
3
(3.66%)
(100%)
(2.44%)
(2)
(0.5)
9
(10.98%)
(100%)
(7.32%)
(6)
(1.5)
9
(10.98%)
(100%)
(7.32%)
(6)
(1.5)
82
(100%)
(66.67%)
(66.67%)
Total9
(7.32%)
(100%)
(7.32%)
41
(33.33%)
(100%)
(33.33%)
12
(9.76%)
(100%)
(9.76%)
40
(32.52%)
(100%)
(32.52%)
3
(2.44%)
(100%)
(2.44%)
9
(7.32%)
(100%)
(7.32%)
9
(7.32%)
(100%)
(7.32%)
123
(100%)
(100%)
(100%)

Chi-Square test:


StatisticDFValueP-value
Chi-square6114.60976<0.0001
Warning: over 20% of cells have an expected count less than 5.
Chi-Square suspect.
A Chi-Square Test of Independence
isangsmith17Jul 31, 20194KB18

<   1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18   >

Always Learning