Results shared by StatCrunch members
Showing 61 to 75 of 120 results matching Chi-Square
| Name/Notes |
Share |
Owner |
Created |
Size |
Views |
Chi-Square goodness-of-fit results:
Observed: observed
Expected: expected
| N |
DF |
Chi-Square |
P-Value |
| 500 |
3 |
25.833334 |
<0.0001 |
Chi-Square test | yes | bstarr99 | Dec 01, 2010 | 490B | 113 | Chi-Square goodness-of-fit results:
Observed: observed
Expected: expected
| N |
DF |
Chi-Square |
P-Value |
| 500 |
3 |
52.5 |
<0.0001 |
Chi-Square test | yes | bstarr99 | Dec 01, 2010 | 485B | 88 | Chi-Square goodness-of-fit results:
Observed: observed
Expected: expected
| N |
DF |
Chi-Square |
P-Value |
| 500 |
3 |
52.5 |
<0.0001 |
Chi-Square test | yes | bstarr99 | Dec 01, 2010 | 485B | 97 | Chi-Square goodness-of-fit results:
Observed: observed
Expected: expected
| N |
DF |
Chi-Square |
P-Value |
| 500 |
3 |
193.71722 |
<0.0001 |
Chi-Square test | yes | bstarr99 | Nov 17, 2010 | 490B | 94 | Contingency table results:
Rows: Prep Group
Columns: Infection
| Cell format |
Count
Expected count |
| |
0 |
1 |
Total |
| Aqueous Iodine |
94
98.7 |
14
9.301 |
108 |
| Insoluble Iodine |
97
92.3 |
4
8.699 |
101 |
| Total |
191 |
18 |
209 |
| Statistic |
DF |
Value |
P-value |
| Chi-square |
1 |
5.3742547 |
0.0204 |
Sternal Surgery Site Infection (Contingency Table Chi-Square Test Results) | yes | silvermanb1 | Oct 29, 2010 | 1KB | 125 | New columns, Chi-Square1-30, added to data table!
Chi-Square samples | yes | mahaley8 | Oct 28, 2010 | 49B | 124 | Chi-Square goodness-of-fit results:
Observed: Weather Diff.
Expected: # of Births
| N |
DF |
Chi-Square |
P-Value |
| 96 |
21 |
77.63301 |
<0.0001 |
Pirkl-Chi-Square test | yes | kari.hay@evergreenps.org | Jun 01, 2010 | 497B | 157 | Chi-Square goodness-of-fit results:
Observed: var3
Expected: var2
| N |
DF |
Chi-Square |
P-Value |
| 272 |
9 |
2.1564822 |
0.9887 |
Final Project Chi-Squared Test | yes | olsen.christina1@gmail.com | May 18, 2010 | 478B | 169 |
Snapshot of Chi-Square calculator Mens Height | yes | charge21 | May 03, 2010 | 10KB | 167 | Contingency table results:
Rows: Gender
Columns: Marital
| Cell format |
Count
(Row percent)
(Column percent) |
| |
1 |
2 |
3 |
Total |
| 1 |
23
(44.23%)
(56.1%) |
16
(30.77%)
(47.06%) |
13
(25%)
(52%) |
52
(100.00%)
(52%) |
| 2 |
18
(37.5%)
(43.9%) |
18
(37.5%)
(52.94%) |
12
(25%)
(48%) |
48
(100.00%)
(48%) |
| Total |
41
(41%)
(100.00%) |
34
(34%)
(100.00%) |
25
(25%)
(100.00%) |
100
(100.00%)
(100.00%) |
| Statistic |
DF |
Value |
P-value |
| Chi-square |
2 |
0.60837656 |
0.7377 |
Chi-Square Table for Gender & Marital Status | yes | bethwharton | Jul 10, 2009 | 2KB | 444 | Contingency table results:
Rows: Marital
Columns: Race
| Cell format |
Count
(Row percent)
(Column percent)
(Total percent) |
| |
1 |
2 |
3 |
Total |
| 1 |
13
(31.71%)
(38.24%)
(13%) |
12
(29.27%)
(41.38%)
(12%) |
16
(39.02%)
(43.24%)
(16%) |
41
(100.00%)
(41%)
(41%) |
| 2 |
11
(32.35%)
(32.35%)
(11%) |
11
(32.35%)
(37.93%)
(11%) |
12
(35.29%)
(32.43%)
(12%) |
34
(100.00%)
(34%)
(34%) |
| 3 |
10
(40%)
(29.41%)
(10%) |
6
(24%)
(20.69%)
(6%) |
9
(36%)
(24.32%)
(9%) |
25
(100.00%)
(25%)
(25%) |
| Total |
34
(34%)
(100.00%)
(34%) |
29
(29%)
(100.00%)
(29%) |
37
(37%)
(100.00%)
(37%) |
100
(100.00%)
(100.00%)
(100.00%) |
| Statistic |
DF |
Value |
P-value |
| Chi-square |
4 |
0.78246963 |
0.9408 |
Chi-Square Table for Marital Status & Race | yes | bethwharton | Jun 19, 2009 | 2KB | 295 | Contingency table results:
Rows: Gender
Columns: Race
| Cell format |
Count
(Row percent)
(Column percent)
(Total percent) |
| |
1 |
2 |
3 |
Total |
| 1 |
20
(38.46%)
(58.82%)
(20%) |
16
(30.77%)
(55.17%)
(16%) |
16
(30.77%)
(43.24%)
(16%) |
52
(100.00%)
(52%)
(52%) |
| 2 |
14
(29.17%)
(41.18%)
(14%) |
13
(27.08%)
(44.83%)
(13%) |
21
(43.75%)
(56.76%)
(21%) |
48
(100.00%)
(48%)
(48%) |
| Total |
34
(34%)
(100.00%)
(34%) |
29
(29%)
(100.00%)
(29%) |
37
(37%)
(100.00%)
(37%) |
100
(100.00%)
(100.00%)
(100.00%) |
| Statistic |
DF |
Value |
P-value |
| Chi-square |
2 |
1.8878646 |
0.3891 |
Chi-Square table for Gender & Race | yes | bethwharton | Jun 19, 2009 | 2KB | 287 | Contingency table results:
Rows: Section
Columns: Satifact
| Cell format |
Count
(Row percent)
(Column percent)
(Total percent) |
| |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
Total |
| 1 |
4
(8.163%)
(20%)
(4%) |
9
(18.37%)
(37.5%)
(9%) |
13
(26.53%)
(56.52%)
(13%) |
23
(46.94%)
(69.7%)
(23%) |
49
(100.00%)
(49%)
(49%) |
| 2 |
16
(31.37%)
(80%)
(16%) |
15
(29.41%)
(62.5%)
(15%) |
10
(19.61%)
(43.48%)
(10%) |
10
(19.61%)
(30.3%)
(10%) |
51
(100.00%)
(51%)
(51%) |
| Total |
20
(20%)
(100.00%)
(20%) |
24
(24%)
(100.00%)
(24%) |
23
(23%)
(100.00%)
(23%) |
33
(33%)
(100.00%)
(33%) |
100
(100.00%)
(100.00%)
(100.00%) |
| Statistic |
DF |
Value |
P-value |
| Chi-square |
3 |
14.178187 |
0.0027 |
Chi-Square table for Course Section & Satisfaction | yes | bethwharton | Jun 19, 2009 | 2KB | 201 | Chi-Square goodness-of-fit results:
Observed: var2
Expected: var1
| N |
DF |
Chi-Square |
P-Value |
| 1706 |
19 |
73.2966 |
<0.0001 |
Chi-Square test
Based on the number of visits in 2008 an expected number of visits per week was compared to the actual number of vists per week in 2009.
The probability of the visits from each coming from the same expected rate is .01% or 1 in 10,000.
This result supports the conclusion that a significant increase in patient visits has occurred. | yes | tgilbertk@brockport.edu | Jun 01, 2009 | 482B | 197 | Chi-Square goodness-of-fit results:
Observed: Number of Classes Taken
Expected: GPA
| N |
DF |
Chi-Square |
P-Value |
| 126 |
32 |
42.405758 |
0.1033 |
Chi-Square test for Project | yes | kayloni21 | May 01, 2009 | 497B | 368 |
|
