StatCrunch logo (home)

Results shared by StatCrunch members
Showing 31 to 45 of 120 results matching Chi-Square
Name/Notes Share Owner Created Size Views
Contingency table results:
Rows: School setting
Columns: Factor ranked first
Cell format
Count
(Row percent)
(Column percent)
(Total percent)
Expected count

Grades Looks Money Sports Total
Rural 32
(21.48%)
(34.04%)
(6.695%)
29.3
42
(28.19%)
(25.45%)
(8.787%)
51.43
61
(40.94%)
(32.97%)
(12.76%)
57.67
14
(9.396%)
(41.18%)
(2.929%)
10.6
149
(100.00%)
(31.17%)
(31.17%)
Suburban 25
(16.56%)
(26.6%)
(5.23%)
29.69
62
(41.06%)
(37.58%)
(12.97%)
52.12
56
(37.09%)
(30.27%)
(11.72%)
58.44
8
(5.298%)
(23.53%)
(1.674%)
10.74
151
(100.00%)
(31.59%)
(31.59%)
Urban 37
(20.79%)
(39.36%)
(7.741%)
35
61
(34.27%)
(36.97%)
(12.76%)
61.44
68
(38.2%)
(36.76%)
(14.23%)
68.89
12
(6.742%)
(35.29%)
(2.51%)
12.66
178
(100.00%)
(37.24%)
(37.24%)
Total 94
(19.67%)
(100.00%)
(19.67%)
165
(34.52%)
(100.00%)
(34.52%)
185
(38.7%)
(100.00%)
(38.7%)
34
(7.113%)
(100.00%)
(7.113%)
478
(100.00%)
(100.00%)
(100.00%)


Chi-Square test:
Statistic DF Value P-value
Chi-square 6 6.841004 0.3358
Mariah West Contingency Table with summary 3
Statistic: Chi-square DF: 6 Value: 6.841004 P-Value: 0.3358
yesmariahwestJul 09, 20123KB61
Contingency table results:
Rows: Grade Level
Columns: Factor ranked first
Cell format
Count
(Row percent)
(Column percent)
(Total percent)
Expected count

Grades Looks Money Sports Total
4 33
(27.73%)
(35.11%)
(6.904%)
23.4
38
(31.93%)
(20.54%)
(7.95%)
46.06
15
(12.61%)
(44.12%)
(3.138%)
8.464
33
(27.73%)
(20%)
(6.904%)
41.08
119
(100.00%)
(24.9%)
(24.9%)
5 39
(22.16%)
(41.49%)
(8.159%)
34.61
63
(35.8%)
(34.05%)
(13.18%)
68.12
10
(5.682%)
(29.41%)
(2.092%)
12.52
64
(36.36%)
(38.79%)
(13.39%)
60.75
176
(100.00%)
(36.82%)
(36.82%)
6 22
(12.02%)
(23.4%)
(4.603%)
35.99
84
(45.9%)
(45.41%)
(17.57%)
70.83
9
(4.918%)
(26.47%)
(1.883%)
13.02
68
(37.16%)
(41.21%)
(14.23%)
63.17
183
(100.00%)
(38.28%)
(38.28%)
Total 94
(19.67%)
(100.00%)
(19.67%)
185
(38.7%)
(100.00%)
(38.7%)
34
(7.113%)
(100.00%)
(7.113%)
165
(34.52%)
(100.00%)
(34.52%)
478
(100.00%)
(100.00%)
(100.00%)


Chi-Square test:
Statistic DF Value P-value
Chi-square 6 23.097757 0.0008
Mariah West Contingency Table with data 2
Statistic: Chi-Square DF: 6 Value: 23.097757 P-Value: 0.0008
yesmariahwestJul 09, 20123KB61
Chi-Square goodness-of-fit results:
Observed: observed
Expected: expected
N DF Chi-Square P-Value
576 5 97.833336 <0.0001
Chi-Square test
Problem 1 <0.001 5 dfs reject
yessonic457_7@hotmail.comJul 09, 2012490B41
Chi-Square goodness-of-fit results:
Observed: observed
Expected: expected
N DF Chi-Square P-Value
80 9 11.25 0.259
Chi-Square test
yessonic457_7@hotmail.comJul 09, 2012480B36
Chi-Square goodness-of-fit results:
Observed: Observed
Expected: Expected
N DF Chi-Square P-Value
576 5 97.833336 <0.0001
Chi-Square test
We would reject the null hypothesis significance level=0.05
yesseanmiller@ymail.comJul 05, 2012490B55
Chi-Square goodness-of-fit results:
Observed: No
Expected: Yes
Group By: Dietary Changes
Dietary Changes N DF Chi-Square P-Value
No 139 65 NaN NaN
Yes 105 50 180.08176 <0.0001
Chi-Square test
yesmjdometrovich@gmail.comJun 09, 2012751B76
Chi-Square goodness-of-fit results:
Observed: No
Expected: Yes
Group By: Dietary Changes
Dietary Changes N DF Chi-Square P-Value
No 1187 65 NaN NaN
Yes 1385 50 454.22647 <0.0001
Chi-Square test
yesmjdometrovich@gmail.comJun 09, 2012753B51
Chi-Square goodness-of-fit results:
Observed: black
Expected: with additives
N DF Chi-Square P-Value
38 6 1.7718327 0.9394
Chi-Square test
yeshaleycatherine@gmail.comMay 15, 2012488B64
Snapshot of Chi-Square calculatoryesidalet953Apr 24, 201211KB89
Chi-Square goodness-of-fit results:
Observed: obs
Expected: exp
N DF Chi-Square P-Value
190 3 1.5508772 0.6706
Chi-Square test example 9.4.5 pg 357
yesrvalek@angelo.eduMar 17, 2012476B134
Chi-Square goodness-of-fit results:
Observed: Old Survey % / 100
Expected: New Survey Frequency, f
N DF Chi-Square P-Value
1 4 0.035553325 0.9998
Chi-Square test
yessdancesav@yahoo.comMar 05, 2012512B88
Snapshot of Chi-Square calculatoryeshaggisthecatFeb 29, 201214KB121
Contingency table results:
Rows: SMOKE
Columns: LOW
0 1 Total
0 86 29 115
1 44 30 74
Total 130 59 189


Chi-Square test:
Statistic DF Value P-value
Chi-square 1 4.9237056 0.0265
This time with a Chi-square.
yeseveadd1Jan 24, 20121KB90
Contingency table results:
Rows: SMOKE
Columns: LOW
0 1 Total
0 86 29 115
1 44 30 74
Total 130 59 189


Chi-Square test:
Statistic DF Value P-value
Chi-square 1 4.9237056 0.0265
Chi-Square Smoking and low BW
yesemmurph1Jan 24, 20121KB73
Contingency table results:
Rows: Treatment
Columns: Outcome
Cell format
Count
(Row percent)
(Column percent)
Expected count

No stroke or death stroke death Total
Placebo 1197
(72.59%)
(23.84%)
1254
250
(15.16%)
(30.34%)
205.8
202
(12.25%)
(26.68%)
189.1
1649
(100.00%)
(24.98%)
Aspirin 1261
(76.47%)
(25.11%)
1254
206
(12.49%)
(25%)
205.8
182
(11.04%)
(24.04%)
189.1
1649
(100.00%)
(24.98%)
Dipyridamole 1255
(75.88%)
(25%)
1258
211
(12.76%)
(25.61%)
206.4
188
(11.37%)
(24.83%)
189.7
1654
(100.00%)
(25.05%)
Aspirin and Dipyridamole 1308
(79.27%)
(26.05%)
1255
157
(9.515%)
(19.05%)
205.9
185
(11.21%)
(24.44%)
189.2
1650
(100.00%)
(24.99%)
Total 5021
(76.05%)
(100.00%)
824
(12.48%)
(100.00%)
757
(11.47%)
(100.00%)
6602
(100.00%)
(100.00%)


Chi-Square test:
Statistic DF Value P-value
Chi-square 6 27.367144 0.0001
HW 13 - Chi-square
yeslmd78@pitt.eduDec 04, 20113KB172

<   1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8   >

Always Learning